Confidential professional firms · Perth & Western Australia
Find five hours a week your team never gets to use.
I’m Lennox Saint, law-trained (UWA Juris Doctor). I help confidential professional firms in law, accounting and finance broking give their team hours back on the repeated work, without weakening professional judgment or moving client material anywhere it shouldn’t go.
Private · 15 minutes · no report, no hard pitch
AI Time-Back Assessment
Synthetic exampleMatter opening (standard commercial)
| Intake brief drafted from the client's first email | 1.30h/wk |
| Precedent selection and clause mapping | 1.60h/wk |
| Document assembly with a consistency check | 1.40h/wk |
| File-note draft with next steps | 0.90h/wk |
| Conflict-check summary from intake details | 1.20h/wk |
| Validated, non-overlapping | 6.40h/wk |
|---|
Guarantee met - over five team-hours a week
Every firm has the work nobody wants to touch.
Intake. Conflict checks. Matter opening. Month-end. File notes. The professional judgment is the easy part. It’s the repeated, document-heavy work around it that quietly bleeds hours your team never gets back.
The AI is not the clever part.
The boundary is. Every recommendation makes the work faster or clearer. None of them make a professional call for you.
In
Workflow facts
Steps, frequency, handling time, approvals.
AI
Drafts, organises, flags
It never advises, decides or files.
Gate
A human turns the key
Your professional reviews before anything is relied on.
Client names, matter files and raw emails stay out. They never enter public AI tools, and no live-system access is required.
Every hour is validated with the person who does the work, and overlapping time is only ever counted once. Nothing counts until it’s validated.
The method and the guarantee carry the claim.
No borrowed case studies. No invented metrics. Here is exactly what stands behind the work, and what doesn’t exist yet.
AI Time-Back Assessment
Synthetic exampleMatter opening (standard commercial)
| Intake brief drafted from the client's first email | 1.30h/wk |
| Precedent selection and clause mapping | 1.60h/wk |
| Document assembly with a consistency check | 1.40h/wk |
| File-note draft with next steps | 0.90h/wk |
| Conflict-check summary from intake details | 1.20h/wk |
| Validated, non-overlapping | 6.40h/wk |
|---|
Guarantee met - over five team-hours a week
The guarantee
Five credible team-hours a week, or the $999 fee is refunded. Identified opportunity, not promised savings.
Law-trained
UWA Juris Doctor. I speak in the duties you’re bound by, and I’m careful with claims because for a professional firm that’s the whole job.
I build, not just advise
I design and ship real AI systems, not just advise on them. Evidence I can do the work, described as capability, never as your firm’s results.
The first client case will appear here, with written permission, the moment one exists. Not before.
Five hours a week, or your $999 back.
One 45-minute conversation. Findings in 48 hours. You keep them either way.
See it with your own numbers.
One repeated task. Your firm’s real frequency and handling time. A conservative estimate of what it quietly costs, before anyone touches the professional work.
Time-Back Instrument
One repeated task. Your numbers. A conservative estimate of the time it quietly costs - before anyone touches the professional work.
freq/week × minutes × avoidable% ÷ 60
15/wk × 12 min × 45% ÷ 60
Illustrative estimate - not a validated result. The Assessment counts only validated, non-overlapping tasks toward the five-hour guarantee.
Workflow facts in. Client material out.
I work from sanitised workflow facts: the steps, frequency, handling time and approvals. Never client names, matter files, raw emails or privileged material. No client information goes into public AI tools, and no live-system access is required for the Assessment.
- No client data enters public AI tools.
- Professional judgment stays with your team.
- The 45-minute discovery is recorded, with your consent.
- An approach you can put in front of your own clients and regulator.
The questions professionals actually ask.
- Do you need our client files?
- No. I work from sanitised workflow facts, never documents, client names or matter files.
- Do we have to buy another AI tool?
- Usually not. Most quick wins use what you already have. If something new genuinely helps, I’ll say so and why.
- Does this replace professional judgment?
- Never. AI drafts, organises and flags. Your people decide, advise and file.
- What if you find less than five hours?
- Then the $999 fee is refunded, and you keep every finding.
- Is this an audit?
- No. One 45-minute conversation and a short, practical set of recommendations. No inspection, no report to your regulator.
- What happens after the Assessment?
- You act on the quick wins yourself, or I can help privately. No pressure either way.
Bring me the job everyone quietly hates.
Fifteen minutes, one useful recommendation, and an honest read on whether AI belongs anywhere near it.